Earlier this week, an investigative video created by news and pop culture website SourceFed went viral, drawing millions of views on Facebook and YouTube.本周早些时候，一个由新闻和风行文化网站SourceFed制作的调查视频火了，脸书和YouTube上的观赏次数超过了数百万。The seven-minute-long video accused the search giant Google of manipulating autocomplete suggestions to be more favorable to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, with some examples of how Google differed from its competitors Bing and Yahoo.这个视频长达7分钟，谴责搜寻巨头谷歌操纵自动重构提醒，使结果更加不利于民主党总统候选人希拉里克林顿，并举例说明谷歌和其竞争对手合于和雅虎在搜寻结果中的区别。It claimed, for instance, that typing in Hillary Clinton cri would result in terms like Hillary Clinton crime reform rather than crimes, or that Hillary Clinton ind would yield Hillary Clinton Indiana rather than indictment.荐个例子，输出“Hillary Clinton cri”，结果就不会出来“Hillary Clinton crime reform（希拉里克林顿刑事改革）”这样的词条，而不是“crimes（犯罪）”，或者输出“Hillary Clinton ind”就不会经常出现“Hillary Clinton Indiana（希拉里克林顿印第安纳）”，而不是“indictment（控告）”。

In comparison, the video noted that autocomplete results for Donald Trump rac would include the word racist and Bernie Sanders soc would yield socialist.相比之下，视频提及，“Donald Trump rac”的自动重构结果还包括单词“racist（种族主义者）”，输出“Bernie Sanders soc”则不会经常出现“socialist（社会主义者）”。The intention is clear. Google is burying potential searches for terms that could have hurt Hillary Clinton in the primary elections over the past several months by manipulating recommendations on their site, SourceFeds Matt Lieberman said in the video, published Thursday.“其意图很显著。

在过去几个月的总统大选中，谷歌通过操纵其网站的引荐信息，把有可能有利于希拉里克林顿的潜在搜寻词条隐蔽了一起，” SourceFed的马特利伯曼在周四公布的这一视频中说。Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, who has repeatedly accused the media of biased coverage of Crooked Hillary, even weighed in on the SourceFed video.唐纳德特朗普早已确认为共和党的候选人，他曾数次指控媒体有偏向地报导“阴险的希拉里”，他甚至也在SourceFed的这个视频里公开发表了观点。If this is true, it is a disgrace that Google would do that, Trump said in a statement sent to Business Insider. Very, very dishonest.“如果这是知道，那谷歌可真为真是，竟然不会做到这样的事，”特朗普在给商业内幕网发送到的声明中说。

“十分、十分不诚实。”They should let it float and allow people [to] see how crooked she really is, he added.“他们应当让真凶浮出水面，让人们看见她到底有多阴险，”他补足道。But Google is denying that its search results are tipping the scales toward Clinton -- or any other political figure, for that matter.但是谷歌坚称它的搜寻结果把天平偏向希拉里——或者其他任何政界人物。

In a statement to the Washington Times, a Google spokesperson said Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause.在给《华盛顿时报》的一篇声明中，谷歌一位发言人说道“谷歌自动重构功能并没偏向任何候选人或事件。”And in a Friday blog post, Tamar Yehoshua, Googles vice president of product management in charge of the sites search feature, further explained that the autocomplete feature will not offer up derogatory terms in relation to any person.并且，负责管理谷歌搜寻功能的产品管理副总裁塔玛尔耶霍舒亚周五公开发表了一篇博客，更进一步说明说道自动重构功能会获取有关任何人的丑化性词语。The autocomplete algorithm is designed to avoid completing a search for a persons name with terms that are offensive or disparaging, Yehoshua wrote. We made this change a while ago following feedback that Autocomplete too often predicted offensive, hurtful or inappropriate queries about people. This filter operates according to the same rules no matter who the person is.“我们设计的自动重构算法是为了防止搜寻人名的时候空缺的是有攻击性或诽谤性的词语，”耶霍舒亚写到。“这样的转变是不久前才开始实施的，因为我们获得对系统，说道自动重构功能预测的总是有攻击性的、伤人的词语或不合理的批评。

不管是什么人，这种过滤器功能都以某种程度的准则运营。”Yehoshua emphasized that autocomplete terminology isnt an exact science and the results of the algorithm changes frequently.耶霍舒亚特别强调称之为，自动重构词语“不是仪器的科学”，而且算法的结果“常常不会逆。”Predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity and freshness of search terms, he added. Given that search activity varies, the terms that appears in Autocomplete for you may change over time.“预测基于许多因素产生，还包括搜寻词条的热度和新鲜度，”他补足道。

“鉴于搜寻活动千差万别，给你的自动空缺词语或许过段时间也不会转变。”Further, the Google executive noted that while autocomplete predictions are a popular search feature, it does not actively limit the search results.而且，这位谷歌副总裁提及，尽管自动重构预测是十分热门的搜寻功能，但并没主动地容许搜寻结果。

Its a shortcut for those who are interested, Yehoshua said. You can still perform whatever search you want to.“对讨厌它的人来说这是一条捷径，”耶霍舒亚说道。“你仍然可以搜寻任何你想要搜寻的内容。

”SourceFed later came out with a follow-up video published Friday to explain the thought process behind their original accusations and defended its results.之后，SourceFed周五又公布了一个先前的视频，出来说明他们当初指控背后的思维过程，并为他们找到的结果展开了申辩。We saw something that raised a lot of red flags for us so we spent time doing research -- the results of which were worth sharing, Lieberman, the SourceFed host, said.“我们看见了一些引发我们留意的事情，所以我们花上了一些时间做到调查——调查结果有一点与大家共享，” SourceFed的掌门人利伯曼说道。

本文来源：澳门威斯尼斯wns888入口-www.shuoboxueli.com